Audiences have always used an informal backchannel to discuss events, but Twitter puts those conversations on steroids and broadcasts them for all the world to see. “It’s amazing how rapidly the Twitter backchannel has been adopted among audiences,” says Cliff Atkinson author of “The Backchannel – How Audiences Are Using Twitter and Social Media … And Changing Presentations Forever.” Jeff Hurt, a meeting professional and director of education & engagement at Velvet Chainsaw Consulting, agrees.
“There wasn’t a demographic that didn’t embrace it when they were taught to use it,” Hurt says. Case in point, his first Twitter-using audience, which was a group of 500 dental insurance company executives. Ninety-eight percent of them were able to text from their mobile devices and did.
But tweets can turn ugly when meeting planners and speakers aren’t ready for them. And while you can’t control how your attendees tweet, you can increase the chances that they’ll tweet you right.
Transparent and Honest Engagement
Says Atkinson, “The biggest mistake is to not acknowledge that people in your audience are using Twitter. By simply verbally welcoming the backchannel in the room, you make sure they know you are paying attention to them, which goes a long way to reducing potentially negative comments.”
Hurt puts it like this, “We tell our audiences, ‘Good vibrations are welcome here. Turn mobile devices to vibrate. If you are going to tweet, here are some suggestions – use the golden rule – tweet unto others the way you would like them to tweet unto you. Say something good before you say something bad. Use some respect.’
“I will also declare it a ‘safe space where differing viewpoints are welcome and respected,’” Hurt says. “‘And if I give out incorrect information or misinformation and you have a better source, tweet it, share it.’ When you do that, it automatically defuses a lot of the negativity that may happen. If it’s your first time, be honest with your audience. Tell them ‘I’m a little nervous. Not sure what you’ll say. Take it a little easy on me.’ The audience will buy right into it.”
Moderate the Twitter backchannel
Pay attention to what is being said about your conference and your speakers by having staff or volunteers monitor the backchannel. Work with each session’s speaker to determine how to best monitor what’s being said and feed questions and information back and forth in both directions.
If you run a big multi-track conference, you can’t be in all the rooms at once. So being able to track on Twitter gives you a sense of what’s happening everywhere, according to Sarah Milstein, UBM TechWeb’s GM, co-chair of the Web 2.0 Expo and co-author of “The Twitter Book.”
Even if you’re running a smaller or single-track conference, people tend to tweet what they’re thinking, she says. This lets you address problems like cold rooms and tweet immediately to let attendees know that you’re fixing a problem.
For speakers, moderating the backchannel is a way to funnel questions, ask for audience responses and make sure you’re on the right track for your audience. “Speakers have a choice when a presentation isn’t meeting audience’s expectations,” says Hurt. “Good speakers already respond to the body language of the audience and adjust. Now they have another tool that can help them.”
Olivia Mitchell, presentation blogger at SpeakingaboutPresenting.com and presentation trainer at Effective Speaking, encourages speakers to have someone else moderate the Twitter channel, then take Twitter breaks to see if there are questions or feedback. “I’ve found Twitter really useful in terms of getting questions and observations from people who might not normally speak up.” When she’s had trouble keeping up with the Twitter stream, she’s encouraged audiences to retweet somebody else’s question if they also want to have the same question answered. That way she can focus on the most important questions during the session and respond to the unanswered questions after the session.
Provide separate session hashtags – or not
When there are a large number of attendees tweeting, consider designating separate hashtags for each session. “We didn’t provide hashtags for sessions and moderators found it hard to pick out tweets about individual session,” shares Milstein.
She doesn’t necessarily recommend assigning separate hashtags for sessions, however. “To save characters, people will often drop the event hashtag and keep the session hashtag, which then makes it hard for people to find those tweets and makes it less likely your event will trend. That’s not to say conference organizers shouldn’t go that route, but if they do, they should be aware that there can be trade-offs.”
Don’t post the Twitter stream behind presenters
“People are there to hear the speaker and posting tweets is at best a distraction,” Milstein says. “People can obviously watch from other places, on their own laptops, on their own phones, and that’s fine and if makes sense if that’s part of the experience a person wants to have individually. But if it’s up on the screen they don’t have a choice.”
Posting the Twitter backchannel in the hallway can be a great conversation piece. But don’t post the Twitter stream behind the speakers as they speak.
Benefit from the backchannel
“The Twitter backchannel is insight into people’s minds. We wish we could see inside people and see what people are thinking while we are speaking?. Now we can,” says Mitchell. Milstein agrees, “It’s like mind reading. You get insight into what people are thinking about your show, and we didn’t have that before.”
Benefit from this mind-reading tool and make your event even stronger. As Hurt reminds us, “Don’t be afraid of change. If it’s actually better for the attendee, you should embrace it.”


Join the discussion
Jeff Hurt Says:
2011-07-12 09:46:33
Kelly: Great article and thanks for including me. As you already know, I actually believe in posting the Twitter stream beside or behind the speaker during the presentation. I've done it for years very successfully. IMO, one of the tools people need to learn for the future, is infotention: learning how to filter information that may appear on several screens at once. Or learning how to filter information being presented in various ways and paying attention at the same time. Just because there is not a screen beside or behind the presenter with the Twitter feed does not mean an audience is paying attention. That is a misnomer and has been for years. Audiences have learned how to be bodily present and mentally absent regardless of what is or isn't on the stage and regardless of how many screens are on the stage. We don't lose attention if there are more screens with more messages. Think about it... Sports bars usually have tons of TVs with different programming. Some have walls of TV with programming for you to decide which to watch. TV news, talk shows and other programming have a ticker at the bottom showing various other news segments. We don't hear anchors or TV reporters complaining about it. Nor do we hear viewers complaining about it. We've learned to filter and focus on what we want. So, IMO, the best practice is leave the decision of displaying the Twitter stream to the speaker. If the speaker wants it, do it! And if someone has a problem focusing on the speaker instead of the screen, then the speaker is probably boring.
Kristi Casey Sanders Says:
2011-07-12 15:36:21
Jeff, I agree that being able to process multiple streams is an increasingly important job skill, but I do have to disagree about it always being appropriate.
We've done both (shown the feed and not shown the feed) at our LIVE Events and have found that there are always a few people who found it distracting. Their issue wasn't that there was negative backchannel or that the speaker was boring, it was more that they were used to receiving single-stream information and the digital noise created by the additional layer of content was just too overwhelming. They're not in such great numbers that we have to stop doing it, but it does mean we need to remember to engage them in another way during educational sessions and not ignore their discomfort.
So I do think that the demographic and learning styles of the audience also need to be considered when making the decision to stream or not. Many AV companies now can moderate and remove negative comments from what is displayed in real-time. But if your audience is primarily composed of people who feel like they're going to retire in the next few years, then maybe it's not worth turning them off from the content.
Kelly Vandever Says:
2011-07-13 18:31:01
Jeff & Kristi - Thanks for adding your feedback and talking about your experiences. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Brain research seems to indicate that we can only focus on one thing at a time with the exception of two activities which are habitual. Assuming the presentation is new information, I don't think it's in the best interest of the attendees to not give them an option about whether or not they are going to split there attention by posting the Twitter stream with the presenter. If individual attendees feel comfortable splitting their attention, then they still have that option on their laptops and phones. I know Jeff that you take your notes by tweeting and that's become my note taking method of choice as well. (I think it may have been you I learned/copied that from!) I monitor the backchannel while tweeting and I sometimes will miss information from the speaker when reading other tweets. It's a risk I'm willing to take at an event. But it's my choice to risk the distraction. And when I want to hang on every word, I do. I want to leave the option up to the attendee as to whether or not they want the backchannel when I speak. And so far... no feedback that I'm boring. By the way... I happen to hate those tickers at the bottom of the screen on news, sporting and during regular broadcasts of a shows. I find them incredibly distracting. Ask my family members... they have heard me complain! As an attendee, my experience has been the same. When the screen is doing it's own thing, I have a hard time concentrating on what the speaker is saying, even when they're a great speaker or have information that I really want to take in. Thanks again Jeff for your contributions to the article and to this continuing conversation! Thanks Jeff and Kristi for giving the readers an opportunity to hear your points of view so they can decide for themselves! Kelly
Traci Browne Says:
2011-07-26 09:13:36
I'm going to chime in on behalf of the distraction camp. All the research on the brain I've seen indicates that, with very few exceptions, people cannot multi-task and are distracted when assaulted with so much information coming at them. My own very unscientific polls indicate attendees are distracted by projections of a twitter stream next to or behind the speaker. The people I've spoken with do not see any added value in them. Kelly, I agree with you...if people want to watch the twitter stream they have that option via smartphones, tablets and laptops. I don't think an entire audience should be forced to have it in front of them. As a speaker it is one thing I ask the organizer in advance. If they are going to project the stream I decline. It shows me they are more interested in flash and tools than they are of my time and expertise.
justin locke Says:
2011-11-29 15:58:28
well let me offer another perspective: let's say you shelled out $150 for a front row seat to hear yoyo ma play a recital. would you be at all interested in a twitter stream of the audience's tweets (or those of anyone who knows the hashtag) being displayed next to him? i suppose some folks would-- there are many people who connect via massive multi-tasking-- but there is still something to be said for that simple bare-bones connection between a performer and the audience. of course there is a big difference between a "masterclass" with a top expert and a done-for-free presentation on a topic given by a peer, where group input can add a lot of value. so i guess the answer as always is . . . "it depends."
Kristi Casey Sanders Says:
2011-11-30 02:05:32
I come from the world of theater and people are deeply divided about incorporating technology and instant feedback. Some theater groups really embrace it as a new way of making theater relevant, reflecting life and sparking conversations. But it's not appropriate if you're trying to focus on a corseted presentation of "Hedda Gabler."
But some traditional theaters have been integrating it into the experience in ways that aren't distracting. For example, at the Alliance Theatre in Atlanta, the tweetstream isn't broadcast behind the actors, but (like you'll see in conference hallways) they'll have the tweets scrolling on screens in the lobby and have online "parking spots" and blogrolls where audiences can leave their thoughts and reviews.
Nearly There – Experiencing a Conference Online | Stumbling Through the Past Says:
2012-01-12 19:58:35
[...] There are still many conferences and many sessions where there might not be a single person to report the discussion online either during the conference or in the week after. Conference organisers can take proactive steps to address this issue. They can try to organise at least one twitter rapporteur to be present and tweeting at every conference session. There is plenty of advice online to help conference organisers and participants create an informative and vibrant twitter backchannel such as this article and this one. [...]
Soapbox
Have an opinion, experience, knowledge or question about this story? Sound off below.
Note: This space is for comments about the story above. General questions to PYM should be sent via our contact page.